Sunday, July 31, 2011

Blog Posts: No Outside Sources Need Respond

SCIENCE AND HEALTH TODAY BLOG POST Distant female bosses may reflect a sexist workplace

http://www.jsonline.com/blogs/news/124623334.html

TAKE HOME MESSAGE:  Health and Science Today blog posts at the Journal Sentinel require no outside source.  This is a great way to highlight the research of new investigators.

INTERVIEW 

1)   The Queen Bee response sounds a little like a “male” coping mechanism—distancing oneself from people considered outside the “in” crowd.  Can you speculate as to why Queen Bees would choose this particular type of coping mechanism in the work place?

2)   Do you think that Queen Bees behave this way out of fear of losing what she has earned?

3)   Do you speculate that Queen Bees feel as though their positions have been hard-earned, and therefore believe that other women should “pay their dues” rather than be mentored.

4)   Do you think those who identified with gender were more able to muster compassion for other women?

5)   Can you recommend some strategies for organizations who want female leadership that is more inclusive toward female members of organization?

Highlighting the Importance of Research, Recruitment of Human Subjects, and Technology

ARTICLE:  “Taking steps to prevent memory loss:  studyhopes to prove exercise could help many.”  MilwaukeeJournal Sentinel [Milwaukee]25 July 2011, E1-2.

http://www.jsonline.com/features/health/126130108.html

TAKE HOME MESSAGE:  People who are passionate about their work deserve a boost.  Keep your eye open for opportunities to promote that passion by profiling good research.

INTERVIEW:
     
Principal Investigator
1)  Are there collaborating universities you want me to mention in this article?

2)  Let's get clear the definition of mild cognitive impairment.

3)  How do you differentiate aMCI from non-Alzheimer's dementia?

4)  How do you differentiation non-Alzheimer's dementia from Alzheimer's?

      5)      I noticed that your exercised and non-exercised gropus had the APOE episilon 4 marker present. Must a genetic factor liek APOE e4 necessarily be present to participate in the study?

6)  How do you test for the presence of this allele?

7)      Can neuroimaging like PET or MRI show plaques and brain shrinking   characteristic of full blown Alzheimer's?

      8)      I want to be clear on the way in which on-going studies progress the work you published in Psychiatry Research this month.

      9)      You want to determine whether the caudate activation you observe with physical activity is compensatory or protective, how do your studies tease out this distinction?

      10)  I read with interest Verghese's 2006 article in Neurology focusing on the ability    of leisure activities such as reading, writing, crossword puzzles to lower risk of aMCI.  How did you control for instances when subjects were extremely mentally active in their daily lives?  Was it possible that these types of subjects were capable of skewing the results?

      11)  I also want to be clear on future implications of your findings:  do you imagine   that Alzheimer's can be staved in some way if exercise is increased after a diagnosis of aMCI?

      12)  Based on your findings so far, how much exercise is reasonably expected to delay Alzheimer's?

      13)  To qualify for the study, subjects also had to meet Petersen criteria for aMCI.  Can you describe some of these criteria?

Study Coordinator 
      1)  I understand the study’s major endpoint:  to measure blood flow in the caudate nucleus and semantic memory pre and post physical activity, but I want to clarify the ultimate goal of these studies:  is it to test the efficacy of exercise in staving off mild cognitive impairment or is it to stave off Alzheimers in people who have MCI or is it to keep blood flowing to a part of the aging brain that is involved in an important type of memory?

2)   Do you typically get study subjects who have been previously diagnosed with mild cognitive impairment?  Or are study participants typically people who have concerns about memory loss?  What do you think motivates your volunteers?

3)   The brochure says that participants need to be between 60-88 years old and able to walk on a treadmill.  Exclusion/inclusion criteria?  Are people with Alzhiemers excluded?

4)   Tell me about your screening process.

5)   Tell me about the famous name discrimination test of semantic memory administered to subjects who volunteer.  What do these results tell you about the subject?

6)   Have you started to collect data in control subjects (or perhaps the studies are blinded?).  How do you differentiate your controls from those who are cognitively impaired?

7)   Let me clarify the time commitment required for these studies:  4 d/wk, 30 min/day, 12 weeks.  This involves 46 visits to the patient by a trainer or lab staff? 

8)   Describe how the trainer works with study subjects to get them up to speed in terms of the exercise.

9)    Do you have any tips for study participants as far as coping with the confinement of the MRI machine?

10)  What have been the subjects’ impressions of the study?

Study Participant 
      Study participant was asked to describe her experience in the study and her motivation for participating.

Neuroimaging expert
1)  Would you be willing to describe that 1991 picture next to the MRI? 

2)  What has been your trajectory since that picture was taken?

      3)      What are some of the important advances in fMRI since you were a student in Milwaukee; what are still some of its limitations?

4)  Can you describe some of the work you’re doing in brain mapping?

OUTSIDE SOURCE INTERVIEW
Would you be willing to comment  on the significance or future directions, or perhaps the pitfalls of this type of research?


A Once in a Lifetime Piece: Honoring the Life of an Unusual Fellow Scientist

ARTICLE:  “Arvedson knew God and science.”  Milwaukee Journal Sentinel [Milwaukee] 24 July 2011, 6B.

http://www.jsonline.com/news/obituaries/126070753.html

TAKE HOME MESSAGE:   Embrace once-in-a-lifetime opportunities.  You may not  pass this way again.

INTERVIEW
Interviews for obituaries are discursive conversations with a family member, close friends, and associates of the deceased.  The death notice--a paid advertisement--provides critical pieces of information and serves as the basis of the interviews.  It was the Journal Sentinel's obituary writer Amy Rabideau Silvers who gave me the advice and courage to write this piece.  I was so grateful for the experience--a real honor as a scientist.

My Golden Story: Novel Nanotoxicology Research Gets its Day in the Sun

ARTICLE:  “Quest for gold:  Researchers study element as nanoparticle, effect on female reproductive tract.”  Milwaukee Journal Sentinel [Milwaukee] 19 July 2011, E1-2.

http://www.jsonline.com/features/health/125753223.html

TAKE HOME MESSAGE:   Earning the trust of a scientist is foremost the job of a science writer.  Make your intentions and your motivations explicit. 


INTERVIEW:

Principal Investigator
1)     Describe nanoparticles and gold nanoparticles, in particular, and the properties that you find most interesting about these molecules.  Give me a brief description of their history as well as their possible applications in industry, medicine, drug delivery, gene therapy etc.?

2)     Can you help me understand just how small these particles are?  Average molecular weight?  What biological molecules can they be compared to in terms of size? 

3)   Briefly describe the primary aims of your present studies.  What do you hope these studies elucidate?

4)      Describe the types of studies you do and how they address the aims of this research.  (In vitro, ex vivo, in vivo).

5)      How did you decide to pursue research in gold nanoparticles and their distribution in the ovary?

6)      What are the promises and pitfalls of gold nanoparticles and nanoparticles in  general?  What are the possible implications of this research whether or not gold nanoparticles prove to be toxic?

7)      What is the funding climate for the type of research you do?  Is the NIEHS yet  recognizing nanoparticle research as relevant in the field of toxicology?

8)       What is the most challenging aspect of this research?

 Outside Source Interview
I am looking for a brief comment—a few sentences at most-- on the state of nanotoxicology research, or how the field is progressing, or the importance of research and risk assessment with respect to nanoparticles. 

When a Scientist Writes about Sports... and Gets It Wrong

ARTICLE:  “U.S. team’s triumphs a boost for women’s soccer:  World Cup showing is a win for all, two local players say.”  Milwaukee Journal Sentinel [Milwaukee]  17 July 2011, B1-2.

 http://www.jsonline.com/news/wisconsin/125695733.html

TAKE HOME MESSAGE:  In journalism, check and recheck names and facts... three times.  My one correction of the summer occurred as a consequence of mis-naming US Women's soccer standout Abby Wambach "Amy".

I received a poignant and well-deserved comment from an anonymous poster on jsonline.com:  "Lmao. This is hilarious. An article about women's soccer and how it's below the radar of men's sports, and you can't even get the star players name right. ABBY Wambach."  Touche, whoever you are.

INTERVIEWS WITH WOMEN FEATURED IN THE ARTICLE:
 

1)  What is your age and hometown?

2)  What position do you play?  What skills do you need to be successful at that position?

3)  What sort of time commitment does your involvement with WPSL require?

4)  What motivates you to play with WPSL?

5)  Are any of your teammates your competitors on the college circuit?  How do you handle this?

6)  What is your future profession?  What aspects of soccer will help you be successful at your future endeavors?

7)  How long have you played soccer?  What has compelled you to stick with the game into your adulthood?

8)  One of the missions of WPSL is promoting the stature of female athlete as role models for youth.  How important is this mission to you?  What does soccer do for young girls?

9)  Your favorite moment so far in the women’s world cup tournament?

10) Who do you most admire on the US women’s team and why?

11) How does soccer contribute to your personal development?  What distinguishes female athletes from those who aren’t involved in athletics?

12) Goalkeeping is one of the US team’s strong suits.  What skills go into being a good goalkeeper?  Is goalkeeping more mental or physical?  What kind of personality type makes the best goalkeeper?

13) The US women’s team coach said the following:  “Technique is very important to the future of this sport and it’s something we need to work on in this country.  We need players who are more technical.”  What does she mean by this and would you describe the men’s US team as more technical?

14) The FIFA president Joseph S. Blatter said, “The football was exciting and very good, although you should never compare it to the men’s version, even though it is the same basic game, with 11 players against 11, one ball and one referee”.  Why not compare women’s soccer to men’s soccer?

15) It is always interesting to hear female players described.  The coach of the women’s team from Japan described her players this way:  “They are short little ladies, but the achieved a lot and I am very proud of my girls.”  I can’t think of an instance where men on a team where described in terms of their boyish qualities.  Do you think there is a certain rhetoric used to describe females athletes, that isn’t used to describe male athletes?

16) While the Japanese women were described as “short little ladies” by their coach, women on the US team have been described in the press as “fierce”, “tough”, “beasts”, and “fearless”.  Do these adjectives ever work against a woman?  When women in a certain profession are considered tougher than average, is there fallout to this?

17) It is said that the team from Japan are motivated to do well for their country because of recent events in Japan.  And while US women are predicted to win, the team from Japan is particularly driven by a sense of deep nationalism.   What obstacles do the US women face when they face off with Japan on Sunday?

18) There is the WNBA and talk of a WNHL.  Will there ever be a women’s major league soccer team?

19) What has the role of coaches been in your life?  Do you consider coaches mentors?  How important is mentorship in women’s sports?  Does this extend to other phases of a woman’s life?

20) What is the perception of women soccer players and how does this perception fundamentally differ from that of male soccer players?

21) What’s the dynamic of a woman’s soccer team and how do you think that dynamic fundamentally differs from the dynamic on a men’s team?

22) Do you think women’s sports are gaining more respect?  What legitimizes women’s athletics in your view?

23) How do men and women play soccer differently (mentioned Journal Sentinel Health and Science Blog about men faking more injuries)?

24) The number of nations seeking to qualify for the women’s world cup has tripled since the tournament began.  ESPN now features women’s world cup soccer.  What would you attribute this increased interest in women’s soccer?






Urban Apiculture: Keeping it Local

ARTICLE:  “Beekeeping creates buzz in Milwaukee:  Ordinances lets urban hives produce honey, pollination.”  Milwaukee Journal Sentinel  [Milwaukee] 16 July 2011, B1+.

http://www.jsonline.com/news/milwaukee/125673818.html

BLOG: "Join the hunt for bees"

http://www.jsonline.com/blogs/news/125380743.html   

TAKE HOME MESSAGE:  Stories that involve opportunities for citizens to engage with science are great ways to expand public interest in science.

INTERVIEWS: 

Study Investigator
1)   Can people in Wisconsin still get involved in the nationwide bee count?  

2)   Can Lemon Queen sunflowers be readily obtained from home and garden stores?  How are these plants best planted and maintained?

3)   Can folks also use the other plant species mentioned in the press release to count bees (bee balm, cosmos, rosemary, tickseed, purple coneflower)?

4)   What would scientists say is the greatest implication of colony collapse disorder?  I’m looking for some statistics that would help people understand how critical bees are to the health of the planet.

Urban Beekeeper
1)  Were you part of the effort to get the bee ordinance passed?

2)  What motivates you to be involved with beekeeping?

3)  What is the greatest obstacle to urban beekeeping?

4)  Are there safety issues involved in this pursuit?

5)  What would you want to say to city residents who may be a little leary about urban beekeeping?

Apiculturist
1)  Since the bee keeping ordinance was passed last year, there has been eight licenses either issued or in progress.  Are you involved in educating people who are applying for their licenses?

2)  What does this involve?

3)  What is your greatest challenge in teaching people to keep bees?

4)  Was there any difficulty in convincing the city counsel to pass this ordinance?

5)  The licenses were issued all over Milwaukee, with no particular section of the city represented.  Can you think of someone in Milwaukee who might like to talk about their experiences with urban bee keeping?






 



Energy Drink Use: Communicating about Study Design

ARTICLE:    “Study looks at musicians, use of energy drinks:  Researchers suggest link to misuse of other legal substances.”  Milwaukee Journal Sentinel  [Milwaukee]  12 July 2011, 2E.

http://www.jsonline.com/features/health/125366743.html

TAKE HOME MESSAGE:  Don't judge a story.  That's the job of your sources.

INTERVIEW:  

Interview with researcher
1)  Have you looked at other cohorts (skateboarders/surfers, BMX bikers/X Game athletes, video gamers)?
 
2)  How do musicians in the cohort you studied perceive the health risks of these drinks?
 
3)  In addition to caffeine, what do you believe are the other worrisome substances in energy drinks?  
 
4)  Has anyone looked at possible synergisms between substances in energy drinks that may particularly enhance their effects?
 
5)  Do you believe energy drinks are used to enhance the effects of illegal drugs?
 
6)  Is there any headway being made to get the FDA to look more closely at the safety of these products?

Interview with outside sources
I am hoping that you will be able to comment on the findings of these studies.  These comments may take any form and may include, for example, the value or pitfalls of survey-based research in the field of addiction science; findings in animals you believe might relate to this research; impressions you have of this research that you think might offer a balanced or tempered view of it.